Web+Quest+Evaluation

Your web quest will ultimately be evaluated by the content, design and presentation given at the meeting. Below is the rubric that will be used to grade your meeting presentation. Each team member will be graded individually for their portion of the meeting presentation. Be sure to refer to and consider the rubric's content while you are developing your group's presentation. Peers watching each presentation will also evaluate the overall presentation using this rubric and provide comments about the presentation as a whole. These evaluations are for information and will not be used in the determination of each team member's grade. Only the teacher's assessment will be used to determine the final grade for each student. Scores in the range of 20-16 will be given an A for the meeting presentation. Scores of 15-11 will be given a B. Scores of 10-6 will be given a C. Scores of 6-2 will be given a D. Scores of 1-0 will be given an E. Note: Extra credit of 2 pts. will be awarded for each member of the group for obtaining and using a digital or VHS video camera for the recording of the meeting. This recording may be used to show future students an example of the end product.
 * Web Quest**
 * The Chemistry of Farming**
 * Evaluation**
 * CATEGORY || 4 || 3 || 2 || 1 ||
 * Originality || Presentation shows considerable originality and inventiveness. The content and ideas are presented in a unique and interesting way. || Presentation shows some originality and inventiveness. The content and ideas are presented in an interesting way. || Presentation shows an attempt at originality and inventiveness on 1-2 cards. || Presentation is a rehash of other people's ideas and/or graphics and shows very little attempt at original thought. ||
 * Content - Accuracy || All content throughout the presentation is accurate. There are no factual errors. || Most of the content is accurate but there is one piece of information that might be inaccurate. || The content is generally accurate, but one piece of information is clearly flawed or inaccurate. || Content is typically confusing or contains more than one factual error. ||
 * Cooperation || Group delegates tasks and shares responsibility effectively all of the time. || Group delegates tasks and shares responsibility effectively most of the time. || Group delegates tasks and shares responsibility effectively some of the time. || Group often is not effective in delegating tasks and/or sharing responsibility. ||
 * Effectiveness || Project includes all material needed to gain a comfortable understanding of the topic. It is a highly effective study guide. || Project includes most material needed to gain a comfortable understanding of the material but is lacking one or two key elements. It is an adequate study guide. || Project is missing more than two key elements. It would make an incomplete study guide. || Project is lacking several key elements and has inaccuracies that make it a poor study guide. ||
 * Spelling and Grammar || Presentation has no misspellings or grammatical errors. || Presentation has 1-2 misspellings, but no grammatical errors. || Presentation has 1-2 grammatical errors but no misspellings. || Presentation has more than 2 grammatical and/or spelling errors. ||

Introduction Investigation Resources Conclusion